Home >> content-4 >> Critical Match of Scan Speed and Pulse Overlap in Laser Marking with Galvanometer Scanners




Critical Match of Scan Speed and Pulse Overlap in Laser Marking with Galvanometer Scanners

In the realm of laser marking technology, the galvanometer scanning system plays a pivotal role in the precision and efficiency of marking applications, particularly with metals such as titanium alloys. The interplay between the scan speed and pulse overlap rate is critical for achieving optimal marking results. This article delves into the nuances of these parameters and their impact on the marking process.

Introduction

Laser marking machines utilize high-precision galvanometer scanners to direct the laser beam across the surface of materials, creating permanent and high-contrast marks. The speed at which the scanner moves (scan speed) and the degree to which the laser pulses overlap are two key variables that can significantly affect the quality and appearance of the marking.

Scan Speed (m/s)

Scan speed refers to the velocity at which the galvanometer mirrors move to trace the desired pattern on the material. It is typically measured in meters per second (m/s) and is a critical factor in determining the marking speed and the depth of the mark.

- High Scan Speed: A higher scan speed can increase the production rate but may result in a less defined mark, especially on materials with high reflectivity or thermal conductivity like titanium alloys.
- Low Scan Speed: Conversely, a lower scan speed can produce more detailed marks but at the cost of reduced throughput.

Pulse Overlap Rate

The pulse overlap rate is the percentage of how much one laser pulse overlaps with the next as the beam scans across the material. This parameter is crucial for ensuring uniform marking and avoiding gaps or unevenness in the marked area.

- High Pulse Overlap: A higher overlap can lead to a more consistent mark but may cause over-heating or over-melting of the material, particularly in deep engraving applications.
- Low Pulse Overlap: A lower overlap rate can prevent over-melting but may result in a less uniform mark, with potential gaps or lighter areas.

Critical Match

Finding the critical match between scan speed and pulse overlap is essential for achieving the desired marking quality without causing damage to the material. This balance is particularly challenging with titanium alloys due to their unique thermal properties and tendency to reflect laser light.

- Optimization: To optimize the marking process, one must consider the specific characteristics of the titanium alloy, the desired depth and resolution of the mark, and the capabilities of the laser marking machine.
- Experimental Approach: Often, an experimental approach is necessary, where various combinations of scan speeds and pulse overlaps are tested to determine the best settings for a given application.
- Real-time Adjustments: Advanced laser marking machines may offer real-time adjustments to the scan speed and pulse overlap, allowing for dynamic optimization during the marking process.

Conclusion

The critical match of scan speed and pulse overlap in laser marking with galvanometer scanners is a complex interplay of physics, material science, and engineering. For titanium alloys, which are known for their strength and resistance to corrosion, finding the right balance is essential to achieve high-quality, durable marks without compromising the material's integrity. By understanding the relationship between these variables and employing a methodical approach to optimization, manufacturers can enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of their laser marking processes.

.

.

Previous page: The Impact of High-Power Fiber Lasers on Titanium Alloy Marking: Over-Vaporization Concerns      Next page: Impact of F-Theta Lens Focal Length on Micro-Marking Precision for Titanium Alloys



Preventing Platinum Discoloration After Laser Marking    

Optimal Quiet Zone for 2D Barcodes in Stainless Steel Laser Marking    

How Many Scans Are Needed for a Colorful Logo on Stainless Steel with a Laser Marking Machine?    

Can the laser marking machine communicate with the PLC?    

Enhancing Precision with MOPA Laser Marking Machine: Real-Time Measurement of Engraving Depth Using Confocal Microscopy    

Can a Femtosecond 5W Laser Marking Machine Create a Black Superhydrophobic Layer on Copper?    

Thermal Resistance in Air-Cooled Laser Marking Machines with 0.1 mm Thermal Paste Thickness    

Evaluating the Decrease in Fatigue Strength of Titanium Alloys Post-Deep Engraving Using ASTM E466    

Laser Marking Resistance of Automotive ABS Interior Parts to Prolonged Sun Exposure    

Implementing Robotic Handling in Copper Marking with Laser Marking Machines    




Related Article

Critical Match of Scan Speed and Pulse Overlap in Laser Marking with Galvanometer Scanners    

Impact of F-Theta Lens Focal Length on Micro-Marking Precision for Titanium Alloys    

Designing a Coaxial Vision System for Real-Time Closed-Loop Control in Titanium Alloy Marking    

Measuring Residual Stress on Titanium Alloy Surfaces Post-Laser Marking: The Application of X-ray Diffraction Method    

Quantifying Marking Contrast: Standards and Measurement Equipment Selection    

Evaluating the Readability of Direct Part Marking (DPM) QR Codes on Titanium Alloys with Laser Marking Machines    

Measuring Marking Depth and Surface Roughness (Sa/Sq Values) on Titanium Alloys Using Confocal Microscopy    

The Impact of Laser Marking on the Biocompatibility of Titanium Alloys as Per ISO 10993-5    

Laser Marking of Titanium Alloy Medical Implants: Avoiding Cytotoxic Residues    

Laser Marking of Titanium Alloys in Aerospace: Meeting AS9100 Traceability Requirements    

Preventing Thermal Deformation in Laser Marking of Ultra-Thin Titanium Foil